Chris Rokos is moving his tax residency from the UK to Greece. He paid around £330m in UK tax last year and was the third largest individual taxpayer in the country. Greece will charge him a flat €100,000 a year on his foreign income for up to 15 years.
In July, 120 UK millionaires wrote to the new prime minister under the banner "tax us, we're proud to pay and here to stay." They want 2% a year on wealth over £10m.
What is striking is that on combined wealth of perhaps £2-£3bn, this group probably pay somewhere between £40-£80m of tax a year. Rokos on his own pays four to eight times that.
In 2020 the Wealth Tax Commission, comprising eminent experts including Arun Advani of Warwick, Andy Summers of the LSE and Emma Chamberlain of Pump Court Tax Chambers spent a year studying how wealth taxes work in seven other countries. It is the most serious work Britain has done on this subject.
They rejected the idea of an annual wealth tax. They said it would be too costly to administer relative to what it raises and too exposed to behavioural response. The tension nobody has solved when it comes to a wealth tax is this: the base must be comprehensive to prevent avoidance, but revaluing private businesses every single year is the hardest job in the tax code. What the Commission recommended instead was a one-off levy fixed at a past date, which cannot be escaped by emigrating, alongside structural reform of the wealth taxes we already have.
Their modelling put an annual wealth tax at 0.17% above £500,000 at roughly £10bn, before administrative costs. The patriotic millionaires say 2% above £10m delivers £24bn - clearly a different answer.
I do tax for a living and see a number of practical problems with an annual wealth tax.
Some say if one rich man's departure can markedly dent public finances, that is an argument for a broader tax base. But surely it makes sense to broaden towards what cannot move, rather than accelerating the departure of what can. Here I mean land and wealth.
A land value tax, offset by scrapping stamp duty would in my opinion be a good alternative solution. Yes, that needs valuation too. But land is visible, already mapped, and valued plot by plot rather than as a shifting minority stake in a trading company. Nobody has yet flown a field to Athens. Achieving this would however be slow, unglamorous, cross-party work, which is presumably why nobody is holding a placard for it.
Politically some are making the argument the rich should pay more. Others are highlighting capital risk. The answer in fact is that we need a tax instrument that actually works.
Andy Oury is an owner partner at Oury Clark Chartered Accountants
Sign up to our Newsletter
Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence

Latest Stories
Sign up to our newsletter
Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence.
© Investment International | Site By Furness Media